A place to share my thoughts and reflections

Tumblr ↗

Tag: christianity

  • A Divine Appointment or a Corrupt Rotation?

    The recent leadership shuffle at the Methodist Church in Fiji has all the hallmarks of a well-rehearsed drama—a script where the President becomes General Secretary and the General Secretary becomes President. The question that lingers is whether this is a divinely inspired transition or simply a managed rotation within a closed circle.

    When Reverend Doctor Semisi Turagavou was elected General Secretary-elect, following the election of current General Secretary Reverend Doctor Jolami Lasawa as President-elect, the optics were unmistakable: the two most powerful positions in the country’s largest Christian denomination had simply swapped incumbents. This is not the language of prophetic succession; it is the vocabulary of a gentlemen’s club.

    Meanwhile, Reverend Dr. Anil Reuben, approaching 50 years of service to the Church, was re-elected as Deputy General Secretary. Some have quietly suggested he was overlooked for the presidency—a question that hangs in the air like incense in an empty sanctuary. Whether true or not, the perception of a closed leadership circuit is damaging to a church that claims to be the spiritual home of the iTaukei.

    The Money and the Pharisees

    This brings us to the uncomfortable question I have raised before: Is the Church becoming a modern-day Pharisees’ club, more concerned with its business ventures and institutional machinery than with the weightier matters of justice, mercy, and faithfulness?

    The Methodist Church is a significant property holder and business entity in Fiji. Its conference deliberations are as much about budgets and assets as they are about souls and salvation. The temptation to prioritize institutional maintenance over spiritual revival is ever-present. When leadership transitions resemble corporate boardroom maneuvers rather than Spirit-led discernment, the Church risks losing its prophetic voice and becoming just another institution concerned with its own survival.

    Jesus reserved his harshest words for the Pharisees—not because they were irreligious, but because they were so meticulously religious that they missed the point entirely. They tithed mint and cumin, but neglected justice and mercy. They built elaborate systems of ritual purity while ignoring the cries of the poor. Sound familiar?

    Parroting the American Model?

    There is a deeper concern here: is Fijian Christianity, particularly its prominent denominations, simply parroting the American model of religiosity—the focus on institutional politics, the cult of personality around leaders, and the spectacle of power?

    This is part of the colonized mind I have also been writting about: adopting external forms of faith while neglecting the internal transformation that Christ demands. The American model often equates ecclesiastical success with institutional size, political influence, and financial prosperity. When a Fijian church adopts these markers of success, it risks abandoning the very humility and service that Christ modeled. We look outward to foreign models of success while ignoring the cries of the suffering at our doorstep.

    The True Test of Leadership

    The leadership transitions in the Methodist Church will ultimately be judged not by how smoothly they were executed, but by their fruits. Does the Church, under this new configuration, show a renewed commitment to:

    · Fighting the scourge of domestic and gender-based violence?

    · Addressing the crises of drug abuse, HIV and NCD?

    · Championing justice for the marginalized?

    · Prioritizing soul-saving over revenue-earning?

    If the Church remains preoccupied with its internal mechanics while these crises fester, then the leadership shuffle is merely rearranging deck chairs on a sinking spiritual ship. The question is not who holds which office, but whether the Church is truly following the way of Christ or merely managing an institution.

    A Call to Reflection

    The lesson is the same one I have consistently offered: the Church must look in the mirror. The Pharisee in the pulpit is not a figure from history; it is the constant temptation of any religious institution to substitute external form for internal transformation.

    The Methodist Church, as Fiji’s largest Christian denomination, carries a weighty responsibility. Its leadership transitions should be moments of deep spiritual reflection, not just political repositioning. The reformed leadership has a choice: to become a vehicle for the Kingdom of God, or to remain a monument to itself.

    The cri de coeur of our suffering—the victims of domestic abuse, the youth lost to drugs, the new baby lost to HIV—demands nothing less than a radical reorientation of priorities. Let us hope the Church answers that call before it is too late. The nation is watching. And so is the God of justice, mercy, and faithfulness.

  • The Temple Within: Reclaiming Pasifika Faith Through Inculturation

    “This is my simple religion. There is no need for temples; no need for complicated philosophy. Our own mind, our own heart is our temple; the philosophy is kindness.”

    There is a truth in these words that our ancestors understood before the ships arrived. They did not search for it. They lived within it. Their mind, their heart, their Vanua, their Qoliqoli—that was the temple. And kindness was not a doctrine; it was how they fished, how they planted, how they mourned together, and how they forgave.

    And then came the missionaries—hand-in-glove with colonialism.

    Western missionaries did not simply offer a new faith; they declared our old one vakatevoro—devil worship. They painted our ancestors as lost, our chants as evil, our connection to land and sea as primitive superstition. They rewrote the very skin of divinity: Jesus, born in Bethlehem under a Middle Eastern sun, was rendered white. White was pure. White was saved. We were told that our blackness was a stain, only their God could wash away.

    Generations internalized this. We burned our carvings. Our Tabua even. We learned to kneel and recite and look outward—to Jerusalem, Rome, to Canterbury, to Salt Lake City—for a holiness we had always carried in our own breath. The temple within was boarded up. The search became external, desperate, and colonial: to be good meant to be like them.

    But here is what we are finally remembering: our traditional spirituality was never devil worship. It was environmental wisdom in sacred form. Our protocols for when to fish and when to rest the qoliqoli were not superstition; they were sustainable marine resource management. Our cycles for planting and harvesting aligned with lunar patterns and soil regeneration. Our reverence for Vanua—land, people, and spirit as one—is now being rediscovered by climate scientists as “community-based adaptation.” We were not primitive. We were prescient.

    The great tragedy is that we spent centuries searching for the wrong reasons—to earn a white God’s favor, to escape the label of heathen, to fill a void that colonialism carved into our identity. But the void was artificial. The temple was never destroyed; only ignored.

    The Wisdom Already Within

    Recently, a niece shared with me her reading of Richard Schwartz’s ‘No Bad Parts’, a book about Internal Family Systems therapy. She wrote:

    “The book talks about how people carry different parts of themselves—some wounded, some protective, some carrying burdens from past experiences—and how healing comes through understanding, connection, and compassion rather than judgment. As I read, I was struck by how much it aligns with many of the things you write about… It reminded me that long before these ideas appeared in books and research papers, our ancestors understood the importance of belonging, relationships, storytelling, identity, and caring for one another. Traditional knowledge and practices weren’t just customs—they were ways of keeping people connected, grounded, and accountable to the community.”

    Her words struck me deeply. Here is modern psychology—peer-reviewed, evidence-based, respected—arriving at the same conclusions our ancestors lived for millennia. The idea that healing comes through understanding and compassion, not judgment. The recognition that we carry many parts within us—some wounded, some protective—and that integration, not exorcism, is the path to wholeness.

    Our ancestors knew this. They understood that a person who had broken a tabu, was not irredeemably evil but needed restoration through ceremony, community, and veilomani. They understood that healing required belonging, that identity was not individual but communal, and that stories carried the medicine of memory.

    This is what I mean when I say the temple is within. Not that we are perfect, but that the seeds of healing, wisdom, and connection are already planted in us—in our traditions, our relationships, our Vanua. We don’t need to import a foreign framework to become whole. We need to unearth what was always ours.

    As my niece put it, “Some of what modern psychology is discovering today is simply catching up with truths that many cultures have carried for generations.”

    The Gift of Inculturation

    This brings us to a concept that offers a way forward: inculturation. Archbishop Peter Loy Chong, in his recent homily honouring the late Ratu Manoa Rasigatale—a son of Rewa, of Fiji, master storyteller and cultural theologian—spoke of this with profound clarity. Inculturation is the process by which faith adapts its teachings, practices, and rituals to fit a specific culture. Instead of forcing one culture’s traditions onto another, it expresses core beliefs using the local population’s language, values, and customs—without changing fundamental truth.

    Rooted deeply in the Christian concept of the Incarnation—the idea that God became fully human in a specific time and place—inculturation teaches that the Gospel must similarly “take flesh” in every culture it reaches. It is a two-way street: the message transforms the culture by challenging harmful practices, while the culture gives the message a fresh, unique way of being understood.

    Ratu Manoa embodied this. He gathered forgotten memories like the dulali (nose flute) and the bacaniqele (earthworm)—symbols our ancestors used in worship and daily life—and made them alive again for today. He designed ceremonial garments and stained glass that depicted Fijian symbols, not European saints. He showed us that the Gospel does not destroy culture; it enters into our culture, purifies some of it, and allows God to speak through it.

    When he welcomed visitors with a kamunaga, he wasn’t just offering a whale’s tooth. He was communicating something that words cannot: honor, humility, and sacred relationship. As the Archbishop said, “Symbols communicate things that touch the mind, the heart, and the imagination that words cannot communicate.”

    Ratu Manoa was more than a storyteller. He was a theologian—helping us see God and experience God through the richness of iTaukei culture. In his own way, he was doing what the Gospel has always done: translating the eternal into the local. He was practicing inculturation before it had a name.

    Reclaiming the Inner Temple

    Some say this is unbiblical. They quote Jeremiah 17:9—”The heart is deceitful above all things”—and argue that looking inward is a path to self-deception, not salvation. They insist that humanity is separated from God through sin and that salvation comes only through faith in Jesus Christ.

    I do not deny these truths. But I reject the colonial framework that says our pre-Christian selves were irredeemably lost and that our ancestors were spiritually empty.

    Consider this: Darwin proposed an origin of life that challenged literal Genesis. Some called it heresy, yet mainstream science accepts it—not as anti-God, but as revealing God’s creative process. Similarly, missionaries called our ancestral wisdom “devil worship,” yet it held ecological and communal truths—God’s fingerprints on our Vanua. If science can broaden our understanding of God beyond a single interpretation, why can’t our culture?

    The Bible itself is full of people who met God in mountains, trees, wells, and ordinary homes—not just in foreign-built institutions. God’s fingerprints are on creation (Romans 1:20). And creation includes the Vanua, the Qoliqoli, and the wisdom of our ancestors.

    The claim is not that humanity contains a hidden divinity waiting to be awakened. The claim is that the Imago Dei—the image of God—was never erased, only buried. Colonialism tried to bury it under foreign rituals, foreign hymns, and foreign garments. Inculturation digs it back up. It says: You do not need to become European to become Christian. You can be ITaukei. You can be Pasifika. And you can follow Christ—not because you abandoned your ancestors, but because the God who made them also made you.

    And as my niece observed, modern psychology is now affirming what our ancestors always knew: healing comes through understanding and compassion, not judgment. The parts of us that are wounded, protective, or burdened are not evil to be cast out. They are parts to be understood, integrated, and brought into the wholeness of community.

    A New Way Forward

    Archbishop Loy Chong has spoken of the veiwekani—the sacred interconnection between faith (Lotu), land (Vanua), and governance (Matanitu). He has called for fusing religion with iTaukei faith and spirituality: Sema na lotu kei na ka vakavanua.

    This is a fresh approach—one that recognizes the Vanua and vakavanua as essential to faith. It is a vision that is sadly missing in Western liberal democracies, where religion has become privatized and culture has become secularized. But in the Pasifika, we have an opportunity to do something different. We can hold both: the Gospel and our culture. Not in tension, but in harmony.

    This is not syncretism. It is not mixing Christianity with paganism. It is recognizing that the Gospel was never meant to be a foreign transplant. It was always meant to take root in every soil, speak in every tongue, and sing in every rhythm.

    The philosophy is kindness. Not as a works-based salvation, but as the fruit of a faith that is truly incarnated. When we care for the reef, we are caring for creation. When we share the harvest, we are living veilomani. When we honor our ancestors, we are honoring the generations that prepared the way for us.

    Modern psychology tells us that belonging, relationships, storytelling, identity, and caring for one another are essential to human flourishing. Our ancestors knew this. The Gospel affirms this. And inculturation allows us to live this truth in our own way, with our own symbols, in our own language.

    Restoring the Library

    Ratu Manoa’s passing is like the burning of a library. His stories, his symbols, his wisdom—they are irreplaceable. But his legacy endures. His videos remain. His teachings remain. The symbols—the dulali, the bacaniqele, the kamunaga—remain.

    And now it is our turn to carry them forward. Not as relics of a pagan past, but as living expressions of a faith that is rooted in our identity. We must preserve his stories, share his videos, and continue the work of inculturation. We must ensure that future generations know who they are as ITaukei, as Pasifika, and as Christians—not in spite of their culture, but because of it.

    Let us stop searching for the wrong reasons—to impress, to secure, to escape, to control. Let us instead sit quietly in the only temple that matters: the open, honest, beating heart of our own awareness. And from that stillness, let kindness simply flow. No temple required. No foreign philosophy needed. Just this. Just us. Just now.

    Because in my book, my religion is within me first and foremost. That doesn’t make it false—it makes it mine. And if the Gospel is truly for all nations, then it must be able to speak in the language of my ancestors, sing in the rhythm of my meke, and dwell in the Vanua that has held our people for centuries.

    The storyteller has gone from our side, but his stories remain. The voice that once told the stories of Fiji, now rests in the presence of the One who is the source of every story, every culture, every language, every people. May his legacy continue to speak long after his voice has fallen silent. May the winds be fair, the seas calm, and the light of the Almighty, guide us all safely home.

    And may we, his children, have the courage to look inward—not to find perfection, but to find the temple that was never destroyed, only waiting to be reopened.

  • The Crisis of Christian Conscience

    The images from Gaza haunt the conscience of humanity: endless columns of desperate families fleeing under bombardment, children sleeping in rubble, parents starving themselves to feed their offspring, and the constant, grinding terror of displacement after displacement. According to recent UN reports, over 250,000 people have been displaced from Gaza City in just the past month alone, adding to the nearly two million already displaced throughout the territory. As I write these words, countless Palestinian families—including an estimated 1,000 Palestinian Christians—are being forced from homes that have become uninhabitable ruins, joining what the International Displacement Monitoring Centre identifies as one of the largest displacement crises in the world today.

    From a Christian perspective, this catastrophic human suffering demands more than political analysis; it requires theological and moral reflection rooted in our deepest convictions about human dignity, divine compassion, and justice. How might Jesus of Nazareth—the Palestinian Jew who knew the trauma of displacement as a refugee in Egypt—view what is happening in Gaza today? What does the forced displacement of an entire population reveal about the state of Christian witness in the world? This question beckons us beyond simplistic binaries and comfortable religious nationalism into the uncomfortable territory where faith meets solidarity with the crucified peoples of our time.

    Biblical Landscapes of Displacement

    The narrative of forced displacement is tragically familiar within Scripture. The Hebrew Bible tells countless stories of exile and displacement—from Adam and Eve expelled from Eden to the Israelites dragged into Babylonian captivity. God’s people knew the anguish of being driven from their land, the terror of living under occupation, and the bitter tears of displacement. The Psalmist captures this trauma vividly: “By the rivers of Babylon we sat and wept when we remembered Zion” (Psalm 137:1).

    These stories were not mere historical artifacts to Jesus; they formed the spiritual imagination of his Jewish identity. When Matthew’s Gospel tells us Joseph fled to Egypt with Mary and the infant Jesus to escape Herod’s slaughter of innocents, it places God himself in the position of a displaced person. The Incarnation thus includes the experience of forced migration—God becomes a refugee, sanctifying the experience of those who flee violence today. This theological truth should fundamentally shape how Christians view Gaza’s displaced millions: in their faces, we encounter Christ himself, who identified with the displaced and marginalized so completely that he said, “Whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me” (Matthew 25:40).

    How Would Jesus View Gaza’s Displacement?

    Based on the gospel accounts, Jesus would likely respond to Gaza’s suffering with three distinct postures:

    1. Radical Identification with the Suffering

    Jesus consistently demonstrated what Palestinian theologian Munther Isaac calls “Christ in the rubble”—the Christ who identifies not with powerful rulers but with victims buried under the debris of violence. In Gaza today, Christ is present in the child buried under concrete, the mother mourning her family, the father searching for bread. Jesus’ ministry was characterized by this intentional solidarity with those on the margins: the sick, the impoverished, the ritually unclean, the occupation-weary residents of Galilee. His compassion (literally “suffering with”) was not abstract pity but gut-wrenching identification . As Graham Joseph Hill writes, “The cross holds no nation; it holds brokenness, and it holds both Israelis and Palestinians”.

    2. Unflinching Truth-Telling

    Jesus would undoubtedly name the realities in Gaza with prophetic clarity. He would condemn Hamas’ horrific attacks on October 7th that killed approximately 1,200 Israelis and took hundreds hostage. But he would also condemn the disproportionate response that has left over 65,000 Palestinians dead, mostly civilians, and created famine conditions. Jesus never remained silent in the face of injustice, whether confronting religious leaders about their hypocrisy or driving money-changers from the temple. His example challenges us to speak truth without partiality, recognizing that “we cannot apologize for truth: and yet we must not weaponize it. We must speak truth rooted in lament, not in tribal vindication”.

    3. Rejection of Dehumanizing Theologies

    Jesus consistently challenged religious frameworks that justified ignoring human suffering. He healed on the Sabbath, touched the unclean, and ate with sinners—all acts that privileged human need over rigid interpretations of religion. In Gaza, Jesus would undoubtedly reject theologies that privilege one people’s security over another’s right to exist, or that use Scripture to justify endless violence. He would confront what Munther Isaac identifies as the “matrix of coloniality, racism, and theology” that enables the current violence . His ministry reveals a God whose compassion is “indiscriminately available to all”, not a tribal deity who takes sides in human conflicts.

    The Crisis of Christian Conscience

    The tragedy of Gaza’s displacement is not merely humanitarian; it represents a profound crisis of Christian conscience. While millions suffer, many Christians have remained silent, defensive, or openly supportive of policies that lead to civilian casualties and mass displacement. This failure stems from what Palestinian Christian Dr. Fares Abraham identifies as “the absence of Christ-honoring compassion during these darkest moments of our humanity”.

    This moral failure has theological roots. For decades, certain strands of Christian theology—particularly forms of Christian Zionism—have uncritically supported Israeli policy while minimizing Palestinian suffering. This theology often spiritualizes away Palestinian rights and interprets biblical prophecies in ways that require unquestioning support for the Israeli state. As the Gaza war strains these theological models, even evangelical scholars are questioning whether their frameworks have “exhausted a group of evangelical Bible professors pursuing unity on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict”.

    The result is what Munther Isaac rightly calls complicity: “The denial is so loud. It’s nothing short of complicity” . When we fail to name atrocities—when we hesitate to call out the killing of 17,000 children or the deliberate creation of famine conditions—we become like the religious leaders who passed by on the other side in Jesus’ parable of the Good Samaritan . Our silence echoes that of German Christians who largely failed to protest the Nazi persecution of Jews—a historical parallel that should unsettle every Christian conscience.

    Beyond Bunker Mentalities: Toward a Cruciform Compassion

    Christian response to Gaza’s displacement requires moving beyond what Graham Joseph Hill calls “bunker mentalities” that shrink our moral imagination . Nationalism, he argues, “shrinks the heart. Tribal identity makes vacuums in compassion.” Instead, we need a spirituality that embodies what the ancient Christian tradition called orthopathos—right emotions—particularly the virtue of compassion.

    Table: Elements of Christian Response to Gaza’s Displacement

    Theological ConceptTraditional ResponseTransformed Response
    CompassionPity from a distanceIdentification with suffering
    SolidarityCharity for those like usJustice for all oppressed
    Land TheologyExclusive divine promiseShared homeland for all
    SecurityMilitary protection for oneHuman security for all
    PeacemakingAbsence of conflictPresence of justice

    This compassion is not mere sentiment but what the Latin root (compati) literally means: to suffer with . It moves beyond sympathy (“feeling for”) to identification (“suffering with”). This compassion becomes incarnational—taking flesh in concrete action:

    1. The Spiritual Practice of Lament

    Christian tradition offers us the language of lament—the spiritual practice of grieving honestly before God. Lament refuses to rush to resolution or theological justification. It sits in the dust with Job, weeps with Jesus at Lazarus’ tomb, and cries out with the Psalmist, “How long, O Lord?”. Lament creates space to “weep with those who weep” (Romans 12:15), holding the cries of Gazan mothers alongside Israeli survivors of Hamas’ attacks. This lament must include both Israeli and Palestinian suffering, refusing to play a morbid calculus of comparative victimhood.

    2. Prophetic Truth-Telling

    Following Jesus requires naming injustices without partiality. We must condemn Hamas’ violence and call for the release of all hostages while also condemning Israel’s disproportionate tactics, blockade, and creation of famine conditions. This includes using accurate moral language—even when it makes us uncomfortable. When evidence mounts from numerous Holocaust scholars, genocide experts, and international bodies that Israel’s actions meet the legal definition of genocide, Christians must have the courage to name this reality.

    3. Concrete Solidarity

    Compassionate orthopathos must translate into orthopraxy—right action. This includes supporting humanitarian efforts, advocating for ceasefires, demanding our governments stop supplying weapons used against civilians, and welcoming displaced people. It means pressuring governments to “open windows for water, food, and medicine, without strings attached”. As Hill powerfully states, “We don’t bless bombs. We bless bread. We don’t sanctify oppression. We wash feet”.

    4. Theological Reformation

    We need to develop theological frameworks that transcend the partisan divides that have captured Christian witness. This requires rejecting the “us versus them” binary thinking that contradicts the inclusive vision of the gospel. As the Christians in Conversation on the Middle East group has modeled, we need spaces where “self-critique” and genuine listening can occur across theological divides. This theological reformation must center the image of God in every human being—Israeli and Palestinian alike—and recognize that authentic Christian hope “lies not in political solutions but in the Prince of Peace who will one day make all things right”.

    The Courage to See Christ in the Rubble

    The forced displacement of Gazans represents one of the great moral crises of our time—a crisis that demands Christian response rooted in the life and teachings of Jesus. This response begins with recognizing what Palestinian theologian Munther Isaac calls “Christ in the rubble”—the Christ who identifies with victims buried under the debris of violence . It continues with embracing a compassion that suffers with those who suffer, and it culminates in courageous action that protects life, demands justice, and refuses to choose between victims.

    The way of Jesus—the way of the cross—invites us to stand in the crack where grief meets hope. It calls us to reject nationalistic idolatries and tribal loyalties that shrink our hearts. It challenges us to embody what Graham Joseph Hill calls “cruciform ethics” that “doesn’t shy from calling out abuses but does so without rhetorical weaponry”.

    As the world watches Gaza’s displacement with either horror or indifference, Christians face a choice: will we be chaplains to power or sanctuaries for the broken? Will we bless bombs or bless bread? Will we sanctify oppression or wash feet? The answer will determine not only the credibility of our witness but the fidelity of our discipleship.

    In the end, the question is not whether God is present in Gaza’s suffering—the Incarnation assures us God is profoundly there, buried in the rubble with the suffering. The real question is whether we will have the courage to join God there.

    “Grief cracks the heart open wide enough to carry courage.

  • Veivakaturagataki or Vesumona? The Exploitation of Our Religiosity

    The spiritual identity of the iTaukei people represents a complex tapestry woven from indigenous beliefs, Christian influences, and political manipulations. When the iTaukei utter the phrase Turaga sa mai vua na Kalou (chiefs come from God), we participate in a theological construct, that has been strategically employed to advance specific religious and political agendas. This fusion of Christian doctrine with traditional chiefly systems, has created a distorted spirituality that serves power structures rather than authentic cultural or religious values; resulting in a population that is devoutly religious yet potentially manipulated, honorably traditional yet unconsciously colonized.

    Historical Manipulation and Spiritual Syncretism

    Prior to Christianization, our spirituality was deeply integrated with social structures and environmental relationships through the concept of Vanua—a holistic worldview connecting the physical and spiritual realms. Chiefs served as sacred representatives of ancestor-gods, possessing sau and mana (spiritual power and authority), while bete (priests) acted as intermediaries within a carefully balanced socio-cosmic order. This system maintained ecological and social harmony through prescribed rituals and respect for traditional knowledge holders.

    The arrival of missionaries and colonial forces, initiated a deliberate strategy of blending Christian concepts with existing structures to facilitate conversion. Missionaries employed linguistic manipulation, introducing foreign concepts like tevoro (devil) to displace existing spiritual understandings. They recognized the potency of chiefly authority and strategically positioned Christian theology to simultaneously undermine and utilize traditional power structures. The conversion of high chiefs including Ro Banuve of Rewa and Ratu Cakobau of Bau, accelerated this process, creating a syncretic system where Christian leaders gradually usurped the roles of traditional bete. This strategic co-option created what scholar Asesela Ravuvu termed “the façade of continuity” that masked fundamental transformations in spiritual power structures.

    This fusion produced a doctrine that equates chiefly authority with divine mandate—Turaga sa mai vua na Kalou. This theological innovation created a double bind for iTaukei believers: to question chiefly authority became tantamount to questioning God’s will, while to question Christian doctrine undermined the spiritual foundation of chiefly legitimacy. This confusion enabled power holders to switch between frameworks depending on what best served their interests, creating what contemporary iTaukei scholars describe as a form of spiritual colonialism that persist, generations after political independence.

    Contemporary Exploitation and Consequences

    The mutual reinforcement of religious and political institutions continues to exploit iTaukei religiosity for power maintenance. The 2010 decree replacing “Fijian” with “iTaukei” in official language superficially celebrated indigenous identity while reinforcing the taukei-vulagi (owner-stranger) dichotomy that serves political interests. This framework has been weaponized into what academics now term “taukeism”—an ideology asserting indigenous supremacy in governance and land control. The previous regime’s policy, while well-intentioned in some aspects, inadvertently ignited among many iTaukei—myself included—a defensive posture that often bypassed critical examination of its broader implications.

    The Methodist Church, to which approximately 64% of iTaukei belong, has historically advocated for “absolute control over this nation by the iTaukei,” illustrating how religious institutions endorse ethnic supremacy. This collusion benefits churches through increased influence and resources, while political leaders gain divine legitimization of their authority—particularly during constitutional crises, when appeals to Christian identity and indigenous rights justify extra-constitutional actions. The military coups demonstrated how effectively this fusion of religious and ethnic identity could be mobilized for political ends.

    The psychological and cultural toll manifests as a population that fiercely embraces Christian identity while valuing traditional customs, despite their contradictory foundations. Many iTaukei have abandoned fundamental practices like traditional kava ceremonies or observance of personal tabu, while still embracing cultural artifacts, reflecting the deep dissociation generated by centuries of spiritual manipulation. This internal conflict represents what anthropologist Arno Parrot terms, “the colonial double consciousness”—where indigenous peoples simultaneously operate within conflicting worldviews without fully inhabiting either.

    Toward Authentic Spiritual Sovereignty

    Breaking this cycle requires decolonizing thinking—critically examining historical processes and distinguishing authentic spiritual principles from exploitative mechanisms. Reclaiming pre-Christian spirituality involves recognizing that ancestral gods were not “fallen angels” but guardians of the Vanua, and reasserting the value of Vanua spirituality as an integrated worldview that connects social, environmental, and spiritual domains. Scholars like Professor Unaisi Nabobo-Baba of FNU, have called for “epistemic rediscovery” that centers iTaukei ways of knowing without automatically subordinating them to Christian frameworks.

    Authentic iTaukei spirituality must navigate between uncritical traditionalism that ignores colonial distortions and wholesale Westernization that abandons indigenous epistemology. The future lies in reclaiming the Vanua ethos that recognizes the inseparability of body and spirit, physical and spiritual worlds, and individual and community wellbeing. This involves revitalizing the understanding that Vanua, encompasses not just land but the social, spiritual, and cultural dimensions of existence—a holistic concept that predates and transcends imported religious frameworks.

    Only through this reclamation can we the iTaukei honor both our ancestral heritage and authentic spiritual aspirations, without being manipulated by power structures that exploit religiosity for control. The path forward requires courageous examination of both our Christian and traditional practices to distinguish genuine veivakaturagataki (reverence) from political vesumona (deception). It demands acknowledging that the arrival of Christianity—while bringing positive dimensions—also served as a vehicle for colonial domination that must be critically examined rather than unquestioningly celebrated. By embracing this complexity, we the iTaukei can move toward a spiritually authentic future that respects our tradition while liberating us from the manipulations of both church and government.

  • Why Support for Modern Israel Is Not a Christian Imperative

    1 Understanding the Theological Distinction Between Biblical and Modern Israel

      The core of Christian fundamentalist’s argument rests on a theological conflation of modern Israel with biblical Israel—a position that numerous Christian scholars and theologians have robustly challenged. Modern Israel is a secular nation-state established in 1948 through geopolitical processes, while biblical Israel represents a covenant community within God’s salvation history . The New Testament itself demonstrates that God’s promises to ancient Israel, find their fulfillment in Jesus Christ, through whom blessings extend to all peoples.

      Theologically, Romans 11 speaks of spiritual grafting into God’s covenant people through Christ—not political support for any modern nation-state. The Apostle Paul’s metaphor emphasizes the inclusive nature of God’s salvation available to Jews and Gentiles alike through faith, not ethnic or national affiliation. This understanding prevents the theological error of equating modern state policies with divine endorsement.

      2 The Ethical Imperative: Principled Non-Alignment in the Face of Injustice

      The Pasifika Conference of Churches (PCC) advocates for principled non-alignment—a position that engages all parties while refusing to remain neutral in the face of injustice . This approach reflects Jesus’s command to “love your neighbor” (Matthew 22:39) by prioritizing human dignity, international law, and civilian protection over partisan political alliances .

      Reverend Bhagwan and the PCC have explicitly condemned all forms of violence—including Hamas’s initial attack—while emphasizing that criticism of the Israeli government’s policies does not constitute antisemitism. Their statement affirms: “We grieve every life taken and reject every hatred—antisemitism, anti-Arab racism, and Islamophobia”. This balanced position recognizes the historical suffering of Jewish people while acknowledging the current plight of Palestinians.

      The PCC’s call for Palestinian recognition at the UN General Assembly stems from the same commitment to self-determination that Pasifika nations have sought in our own decolonization journeys. This consistency is what Reverend Bhagwan means by an “Ocean of Peace”—a vision that demands ethical coherence rather than selective application of principles .

      3 The Pasifika Context: Why Fiji’s Embassy Decision now is Problematic

      The Fiji government’s decision to establish an embassy in Jerusalem at this time, contradicts international consensus that the city’s status should be resolved through final-status negotiations . The PCC has cautioned against this move precisely because it prejudges Jerusalem’s status and potentially normalizes ongoing violations of international law .

      Prime Minister Rabuka’s claim that this is “not a religious decision” but rather “strategic engagement” rings hollow when considering Fiji’s own peacekeeping history in the region. Fijian soldiers have witnessed firsthand the devastating consequences of conflict, including the 1996 Qana massacre where Israeli shelling killed 106 Lebanese civilians sheltering at a UN compound. This historical context makes Fiji’s diplomatic move particularly morally troubling.

      The PCC’s critique is not about rejecting dialogue with Israel but about ensuring that engagement serves peace with justice. As Reverend Bhagwan notes: “We cannot talk about the killing of thousands of people, unarmed civilians, children, the destruction of humanitarian spaces and at the same time talk about relationship with the countries that are perpetrating this violence” .

      4 Conclusion: Toward a Consistent Christian Witness

      Christian support for the modern state of Israel is not a theological imperative but a political choice—one that must be evaluated based on its alignment with Christian values of justice, peace, and human dignity. The Pasifika Conference of Churches offers a theologically robust and ethically consistent framework that:

      1. Distinguishes between biblical Israel and the modern state of Israel
      2. Affirms the equal worth and dignity of both Israeli and Palestinian people
      3. Advocates for peace based on international law and human rights
      4. Rejects all forms of violence and discrimination

      This approach honors Christianity’s Jewish roots while recognizing that the church’s primary allegiance is to God’s kingdom—not any earthly nation. As Jesus told Pilate: “My kingdom is not of this world” (John 18:36). Our call as Christians is to bear witness to this alternative reality where peace is established through justice, reconciliation through truth, and security through equal rights for all .

      Rev. James Bhagwan and the Pasifika Conference of Churches, exemplify this prophetic witness—one that speaks truth to power while extending compassion to all affected by conflict. This is not abandonment of Christian roots but rather its fullest expression.

    1. The Pacific’s Prophetic Paradox: Faith, Myth, and the Unwavering Support for Israel

      The fascinating and deeply reported account of the Pasifika’s allegiance to Israel reveals a complex tapestry of faith, identity politics, and geopolitical strategy. From the Negev Desert to the jungles of Malaita and the government offices of Draiba, a powerful narrative—the myth of the Lost Tribes of Israel—has been woven, binding remote island nations to a distant conflict in the Middle East. However, this unwavering support, born from a desire for significance and spiritual homecoming, appears to many observers as a profound paradox. While presented as a righteous stand for an “elder brother,” this alignment, championed by fundamentalist Christian leaders, often overlooks a critical examination of both scripture and the stark reality of Israel’s modern actions, culminating in what can only be described as a tragic abdication of moral responsibility in the face of the devastating genocide in Gaza.

      The allure of the Lost Tribes myth is undeniably powerful, especially for nations historically relegated to the margins of global affairs. For the people of Fiji, the Solomon Islands, and others, the story is not mere folklore; it is a theological and historical anchor. It transforms them from inhabitants of “the ends of the earth” into central players in a millennia-old biblical saga. As Robert Kaua in the Solomons articulated, this belief provides a “lifetime commitment,” a sense of divine purpose that elevates their national identity above one of mere post-colonial struggle. This deep-seated need for a glorious past and a significant future is a potent force. When combined with the evangelical framework that views the modern state of Israel as a prerequisite for Christ’s second coming, it creates an ideological imperative to defend it unconditionally. The emotional resonance is clear: the Fijian marchers waving Israeli flags and blowing shofars genuinely feel they are championing their own family.

      Yet, this fervent belief is dangerously susceptible to manipulation, both from within and without. The reporting exposes a startling cynicism among the myth’s most prominent champions. The retired Solomon Islands warlord Jimmy Lusibaea admits the story was a useful tool for morale, a banner under which to wage a holy war, yet he privately expresses uncertainty about its truth. Fiji’s Deputy Prime Minister Viliame Gavoka, who leverages the myth for political capital, squirms and stammers when asked directly for his belief, eventually conceding it’s a useful narrative to make people “buy into what you believe in.” Most telling is the preacher Mikaele Mudreilagi, whose vision in the desert propelled him to activism. When pressed, his conviction crumbles into a hesitant “if” and a “possibility,” a far cry from the certainty he preached to his followers. These leaders are not true believers; they are entrepreneurs of faith, packaging a palatable prophecy to consolidate power, win elections, and gain relevance.

      This internal manipulation is compounded and encouraged by external actors who recognize the strategic value of these votes on the world stage. Organizations like the International Christian Embassy Jerusalem (ICEJ) actively cultivate and celebrate this support. Their president’s praise for the Fijian branch’s “amazing impact” reveals a clear understanding that these Pasifika nations are a diplomatic lifeline. In forums like the United Nations and the International Court of Justice, where Israel faces near-total isolation, the votes of Fiji, Nauru, and Papua New Guinea are priceless. The establishment of the so-called Indigenous Embassy in Jerusalem is a masterstroke of propaganda, weaponizing the concept of indigeneity, to shield the Israeli government from accusations of settler colonialism. By presenting Pasifika Islanders as “indigenous advocates” for Israel, it creates a moral equivalence that is both historically inaccurate and ethically grotesque, effectively using the descendants of one colonized people to launder the reputation of a modern occupying power.

      This brings us to the most troubling aspect of this alliance: the profound and willful moral disconnect it requires. The fundamentalist Christianity that underpins this support is highly selective. It cherry-picks the Old Testament—the covenants with Abraham, the glory of King Solomon’s Ophir—while systematically ignoring the unsavory bits: the genocidal commands, the prophetic calls for justice, and the entirety of Christ’s teachings in the New Testament centered on mercy, peacemaking, and love for one’s enemy. This faith has been utterly brainwashed, into aligning with a Western, conservative political project that values nationalist expansion over universal human dignity.

      The brutal reality in Gaza is the ultimate test of this cherry-picked faith. As Israel’s military campaign, under the leadership of Benjamin Netanyahu, has unleashed a horrifying scale of destruction—leveling entire neighborhoods, killing tens of thousands of civilians, and creating a man-made famine—the response from these Pasifika champions has been to double down. They frame it solely as a war of good against evil, of Israel against Hamas, refusing to engage with the disproportionate and collective punishment being meted out upon a largely helpless population. To stand with Israel is one thing; to offer unqualified support for a campaign the International Court of Justice has found to be “plausibly” genocidal is another entirely. Their “missile prayers” are not for the ceasing of violence or the protection of all innocent life but for the victory of one side, blind to the mountains of corpses being created in their name.

      The great tragedy is that this position betrays the very indigenous and spiritual values these nations claim to hold. Pasifika cultures are traditionally built on community, reciprocity, and a deep connection to the land. To see leaders like Gavoka and Mudreilagi use their influence to endorse the dispossession and slaughter of another people connected to their land is a bitter irony. The compassionate wisdom of their own cultures, which should inspire calls for reconciliation and ceasefire, is drowned out by the drumbeat of apocalyptic zeal and realpolitik. They pray for a time when “the two flags unite,” as Kaua did, while their government’s actions on the world stage empower the very forces making that dream impossible.

      In the end, the story of the Pasifika’s support for Israel is a cautionary tale about the power of story and the danger of faith divorced from critical ethics. The Lost Tribes myth provided a beautiful dream of belonging and purpose. But in the hands of cynical leaders and foreign interest groups, it has been weaponized into a narrative that justifies overlooking a horrific reality. It is a testament to the fact that the most potent myths are not those that are true, but those that we desperately want to believe—even if that belief requires closing our eyes to a genocide and abdicating our shared responsibility for our fellow human beings.